๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ƒ๐ž๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐‘๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐‰๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž ๐’๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ฌ ๐‚๐š๐ฌ๐ž

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ƒ๐ž๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐‘๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐‰๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž ๐’๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ฌ ๐‚๐š๐ฌ๐ž:

The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court has recently released its detail review judgment in the Reserve Seats Case on which the Court by majority has overruled the original judgment in which the had reversed the clock and given time to the alleged independent candidates to identify their status and join a parliamentary party within 15 days.

Justice Amin Uddin is author of the judgment. The entire judgment revolves around one technical point that PTI was not before the Supreme Court, nor the Peshawar High Court and nor even before the Election Commission of Pakistan for the reserve seats. Hence, a party, which was not before any forum. cannot be granted reserve seats.

The original judgment was based on general principles of law such as that when a person is wronged by a public body he must be placed in the same position in which he was before the wrong was done to him/her; that justice does not mean that law should be followed irrespective of whether it entails justice or not; that justice means to give each his due and reestablish a lost harmony and equilibrium; and that election matters are not like ordinary civil matters. These matters are public matters and they are more related to the constituencies not to individuals.

ย  ย Click to downloadย 

c.r.p._312_2024_2102025

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top